We do not begin with deployment.
Every instruction starts with a structured assessment to establish whether our involvement is appropriate and what level of support is required.
Clear understanding of exposure
Proportionate response planning
Defensible decision-making
We are typically engaged by individuals requiring discretion, organisations managing risk, and legal or regulatory professionals.
Reactive deployment without clarity
Escalation driven by assumptions
Generic or off-the-shelf responses
Access ongoing matters, administrative services, and secure communications related to current engagements.
An insurance fraud investigation in Edinburgh is used where uncertainty exists around the accuracy, legitimacy, or surrounding circumstances of an insurance claim. These investigations support informed decision-making before financial, legal, or organisational action is taken, particularly where progressing a claim without verification may expose insurers or organisations to avoidable risk.
At Dion International, investigative support is applied selectively and proportionately. The purpose is not escalation or disruption, but to establish objective facts that allow decisions to be made with confidence, clarity, and defensibility.
Edinburgh’s professional, commercial, and public-sector environment generates a broad range of insurance and personal injury claims. These include incidents arising in office-based workplaces, public buildings, hospitality venues, retail settings, transport networks, and construction projects across the city and surrounding areas.
Claims may involve reported injuries, financial loss, or liability where accounts are unclear or evidence is limited. In some cases, inconsistencies may arise between reported circumstances, medical information, timelines, or independent accounts. In others, claims may be genuine but lack sufficient supporting detail, creating uncertainty for insurers, employers, and legal advisers.
Where such uncertainty exists, investigative activity may be used to establish objective clarity through structured information gathering, discreet observation, and behavioural assessment. This allows claims to be evaluated accurately and proportionate decisions to be made based on evidence rather than assumption.
Each instruction is assessed individually to determine whether investigative activity is justified and likely to provide meaningful clarity. Investigations are then focused on the specific uncertainty identified, ensuring that scope remains proportionate and relevant to the decision being considered.
Information is gathered methodically, assessed objectively, and documented clearly. The emphasis remains on clarity, relevance, and proportionality throughout, ensuring that findings support insurance, legal, or internal decision-making without unnecessary intrusion or expansion of scope.